<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 13 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14751</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and upholding the addition of Rs. 4,98,110 towards gross profit due to discrepancies in the closing stock of a partnership firm engaged in various businesses. The Court emphasized the importance of physical stock verification by forest authorities and noted the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adequately address discrepancies, leading to the decision in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:37:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 13 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14751</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and upholding the addition of Rs. 4,98,110 towards gross profit due to discrepancies in the closing stock of a partnership firm engaged in various businesses. The Court emphasized the importance of physical stock verification by forest authorities and noted the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adequately address discrepancies, leading to the decision in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>