https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368441 An incorrect result list circulated by email and on social media did not create any enforceable right where the official website had already reflected the corrected result approved by the Examination Committee. The Court noted that moderation was limited to 13 marks and that the higher paper-wise moderation shown in the erroneous internal communication had not been sanctioned. A mistaken communication, not amounting to an official declaration, could not confer legal entitlement on the appellants. The challenge to the official result therefore failed. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:43:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368441 An incorrect result list circulated by email and on social media did not create any enforceable right where the official website had already reflected the corrected result approved by the Examination Committee. The Court noted that moderation was limited to 13 marks and that the higher paper-wise moderation shown in the erroneous internal communication had not been sanctioned. A mistaken communication, not amounting to an official declaration, could not confer legal entitlement on the appellants. The challenge to the official result therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368441