<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 399 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368433</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that the extended period of limitation for the show cause notice was not valid as there was no deliberate evasion of service tax by the appellant. Additionally, the appellant was allowed to avail the composition scheme for payment of service tax, with penalties waived and consequential benefits granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:42:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 399 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368433</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that the extended period of limitation for the show cause notice was not valid as there was no deliberate evasion of service tax by the appellant. Additionally, the appellant was allowed to avail the composition scheme for payment of service tax, with penalties waived and consequential benefits granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>