<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 393 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the waste products generated during the manufacturing process of refined oils were covered by the exemption notification. The by-products like fatty acid oil, sludge, soap stock, and spent earth were deemed waste arising during the refining process, not excisable goods. Therefore, the appellant was not liable to pay central excise duty on these by-products as they fell under the exemption provided by Notification No. 89/95-CE. The decision aligned with a previous Larger Bench judgment and granted the appellant consequential benefits, overturning the Department&#039;s demand for duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 393 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the waste products generated during the manufacturing process of refined oils were covered by the exemption notification. The by-products like fatty acid oil, sludge, soap stock, and spent earth were deemed waste arising during the refining process, not excisable goods. Therefore, the appellant was not liable to pay central excise duty on these by-products as they fell under the exemption provided by Notification No. 89/95-CE. The decision aligned with a previous Larger Bench judgment and granted the appellant consequential benefits, overturning the Department&#039;s demand for duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>