<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 392 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368426</link>
    <description>Extended limitation for recovery of disputed Cenvat credit was unavailable where the records showed the transactions, and there was no allegation or finding of fraud, suppression of facts, or falsification. The dispute concerned credit on input services linked to plant setup and rehabilitation and resettlement arrangements, but the controversy was treated as one of legal interpretation rather than concealment. In the absence of the ingredients required to invoke the extended period, the show cause notice could not be sustained on that ground, and the appeal succeeded with the impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:42:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 392 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368426</link>
      <description>Extended limitation for recovery of disputed Cenvat credit was unavailable where the records showed the transactions, and there was no allegation or finding of fraud, suppression of facts, or falsification. The dispute concerned credit on input services linked to plant setup and rehabilitation and resettlement arrangements, but the controversy was treated as one of legal interpretation rather than concealment. In the absence of the ingredients required to invoke the extended period, the show cause notice could not be sustained on that ground, and the appeal succeeded with the impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>