<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 385 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368419</link>
    <description>Rejection of a settlement application under a beneficial arrears scheme was held unsustainable because the authority did not give the applicant the statutory reasonable opportunity to show cause before refusing relief. The petitioner had already paid the amounts contemplated under the scheme, and the dispute centred on whether interest had to be computed from the original assessment order. As the application was rejected without compliance with the proviso to Section 8(2), the order was set aside. The petitioner was directed to pay the balance interest, and the authority was required to reconsider and dispose of the settlement application afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 385 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368419</link>
      <description>Rejection of a settlement application under a beneficial arrears scheme was held unsustainable because the authority did not give the applicant the statutory reasonable opportunity to show cause before refusing relief. The petitioner had already paid the amounts contemplated under the scheme, and the dispute centred on whether interest had to be computed from the original assessment order. As the application was rejected without compliance with the proviso to Section 8(2), the order was set aside. The petitioner was directed to pay the balance interest, and the authority was required to reconsider and dispose of the settlement application afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>