<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14743</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the advance amounts received by the assessee should be considered as income and brought to tax. The court rejected the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the timing of income accrual and past practices accepted by the Department, ultimately deciding against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:16:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14743</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the advance amounts received by the assessee should be considered as income and brought to tax. The court rejected the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the timing of income accrual and past practices accepted by the Department, ultimately deciding against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>