<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275559</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the decisions of the State and National Commissions, and restored the District Forum&#039;s decision. The Court emphasized the inadmissibility of evidence contradicting the written agreement and the lack of proof for the alleged cash payment. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 10:39:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275559</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the decisions of the State and National Commissions, and restored the District Forum&#039;s decision. The Court emphasized the inadmissibility of evidence contradicting the written agreement and the lack of proof for the alleged cash payment. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>