<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 360 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368394</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal. The ITAT found that there was no deliberate intent in furnishing inaccurate particulars, as mens rea was not established. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing deliberate intent for imposing penalties, in line with legal precedents set by the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:32:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 360 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368394</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal. The ITAT found that there was no deliberate intent in furnishing inaccurate particulars, as mens rea was not established. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing deliberate intent for imposing penalties, in line with legal precedents set by the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>