<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 356 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the Cross Objection by the assessee. It held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the IT Act was invalid as the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material. Furthermore, the Tribunal upheld that the assessee had commenced commercial activities, supporting the classification of expenses as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 356 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the Cross Objection by the assessee. It held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the IT Act was invalid as the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material. Furthermore, the Tribunal upheld that the assessee had commenced commercial activities, supporting the classification of expenses as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>