<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368388</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 35 lakhs under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee provided sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of transactions. However, the disallowance of expenses claimed by the assessee amounting to Rs. 1,24,563 was upheld due to the lack of proof linking the expenses to income earned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368388</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 35 lakhs under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee provided sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of transactions. However, the disallowance of expenses claimed by the assessee amounting to Rs. 1,24,563 was upheld due to the lack of proof linking the expenses to income earned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>