<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368387</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, while the appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee were dismissed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue of technical services in light of the new Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and Protocol, and upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision on Transfer Pricing adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368387</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, while the appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee were dismissed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue of technical services in light of the new Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and Protocol, and upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision on Transfer Pricing adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>