<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 349 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HYDERABAD TELANGANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368383</link>
    <description>An advance ruling on the classification and tax rate of coir sheets, rubberised coir sheets or blocks could not be issued because the applicant did not furnish the material needed to determine the correct tariff and notification entry. The Authority noted that coir products other than coir mattresses and mattress supports were covered under different entries, but the record was insufficient to decide whether the goods were ordinary coir products or bedding-related articles. As no product catalogue or further particulars were produced despite being asked for, the application was disposed of without a substantive ruling on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 349 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HYDERABAD TELANGANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368383</link>
      <description>An advance ruling on the classification and tax rate of coir sheets, rubberised coir sheets or blocks could not be issued because the applicant did not furnish the material needed to determine the correct tariff and notification entry. The Authority noted that coir products other than coir mattresses and mattress supports were covered under different entries, but the record was insufficient to decide whether the goods were ordinary coir products or bedding-related articles. As no product catalogue or further particulars were produced despite being asked for, the application was disposed of without a substantive ruling on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>