<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368381</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, and instructed the Assessing Officer to follow the principles of natural justice in the revision process. The Court also directed the Assessing Officer to consider any amount deposited during the pendency of the writ petition in the fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368381</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, and instructed the Assessing Officer to follow the principles of natural justice in the revision process. The Court also directed the Assessing Officer to consider any amount deposited during the pendency of the writ petition in the fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>