<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving mis-declaration of value in an imported consignment of cooling pads. The appellant importer&#039;s declared value was found to be mis-declared, leading to the department enhancing the value. The appellant challenged the application of Customs Valuation Rule 5 and emphasized negotiations with the foreign supplier for a lower price. The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the declared value but directed the use of the lower range of contemporaneous import prices for valuation. The matter was remanded for redetermination of customs duty at a value of &amp;amp;8377; 180 per kg instead of &amp;amp;8377; 220 per kg, emphasizing correct valuation principles and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving mis-declaration of value in an imported consignment of cooling pads. The appellant importer&#039;s declared value was found to be mis-declared, leading to the department enhancing the value. The appellant challenged the application of Customs Valuation Rule 5 and emphasized negotiations with the foreign supplier for a lower price. The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the declared value but directed the use of the lower range of contemporaneous import prices for valuation. The matter was remanded for redetermination of customs duty at a value of &amp;amp;8377; 180 per kg instead of &amp;amp;8377; 220 per kg, emphasizing correct valuation principles and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>