<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 331 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368365</link>
    <description>Imported used clinical equipment treated as capital goods and intended for charitable use was later covered by an ad hoc Government exemption. In view of that subsequent exemption being available on record, the basis for confiscatory consequences no longer survived. Redemption fine and penalty were therefore not warranted and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:28:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 331 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368365</link>
      <description>Imported used clinical equipment treated as capital goods and intended for charitable use was later covered by an ad hoc Government exemption. In view of that subsequent exemption being available on record, the basis for confiscatory consequences no longer survived. Redemption fine and penalty were therefore not warranted and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>