<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 317 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368351</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudicatory fiscal order was declined because an effective statutory appeal was available. The normal rule in tax and other fiscal matters is that the party must first pursue the alternative appellate remedy, unless the impugned order is without jurisdiction, violates natural justice, or is patently erroneous. No such exceptional ground was shown, so writ jurisdiction was not exercised at that stage and the merits of classification, demand, penalty, and interest were left open for the statutory appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 317 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368351</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudicatory fiscal order was declined because an effective statutory appeal was available. The normal rule in tax and other fiscal matters is that the party must first pursue the alternative appellate remedy, unless the impugned order is without jurisdiction, violates natural justice, or is patently erroneous. No such exceptional ground was shown, so writ jurisdiction was not exercised at that stage and the merits of classification, demand, penalty, and interest were left open for the statutory appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>