https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368349 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the transfer of CENVAT credit to new premises. The Commissioner (A)'s order directing the reversal of credit was set aside due to insufficient proof of goods transfer. Despite the lack of explicit permission for credit transfer, the Tribunal found the appellant compliant with Rule 10 of CENVAT Credit Rules and previous precedents, validating the credit transfer based on intimation and audit reports. The importance of proper documentation and adherence to rules in such transfers was highlighted in the case. en-us Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:27:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368349 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the transfer of CENVAT credit to new premises. The Commissioner (A)'s order directing the reversal of credit was set aside due to insufficient proof of goods transfer. Despite the lack of explicit permission for credit transfer, the Tribunal found the appellant compliant with Rule 10 of CENVAT Credit Rules and previous precedents, validating the credit transfer based on intimation and audit reports. The importance of proper documentation and adherence to rules in such transfers was highlighted in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368349