<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 313 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368347</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit under Section 26(6B) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 is a mandatory condition precedent for filing an appeal before the Tribunal, and the provision contains no exception for financial hardship or other practical difficulty. Because the assessee had not deposited any part of the tax dues, the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to dispense with deposit was not interfered with in writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The Court noted that, after making the requisite deposit, the assessee may pursue an appeal with a separate request for condonation of delay under Section 81, to be considered on its own merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 07:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 313 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368347</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit under Section 26(6B) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 is a mandatory condition precedent for filing an appeal before the Tribunal, and the provision contains no exception for financial hardship or other practical difficulty. Because the assessee had not deposited any part of the tax dues, the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to dispense with deposit was not interfered with in writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The Court noted that, after making the requisite deposit, the assessee may pursue an appeal with a separate request for condonation of delay under Section 81, to be considered on its own merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>