https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275545 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to dismiss the appellant's suit for partition of family properties. The court found that the evidence, including an admission of partition in 1914, supported the conclusion that the properties were self-acquired and not subject to partition. The appellant's challenge to certain alienations was unsuccessful, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Oct 2018 18:02:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275545 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to dismiss the appellant's suit for partition of family properties. The court found that the evidence, including an admission of partition in 1914, supported the conclusion that the properties were self-acquired and not subject to partition. The appellant's challenge to certain alienations was unsuccessful, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275545