https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275539 In an appeal against acquittal based on circumstantial evidence, interference is justified only where the proved circumstances are fully established, conclusive, and form a complete chain consistent only with guilt. An alleged extra-judicial confession will not carry weight if the witnesses are doubtful or appear inimically placed, and a forensic circumstance such as bloodstains is insufficient if the blood group is not determined and the source of the blood remains uncertain. Applying these principles, the acquittal was treated as a plausible view and was not disturbed. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275539 In an appeal against acquittal based on circumstantial evidence, interference is justified only where the proved circumstances are fully established, conclusive, and form a complete chain consistent only with guilt. An alleged extra-judicial confession will not carry weight if the witnesses are doubtful or appear inimically placed, and a forensic circumstance such as bloodstains is insufficient if the blood group is not determined and the source of the blood remains uncertain. Applying these principles, the acquittal was treated as a plausible view and was not disturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275539