https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275529 A repealed rent-control law's saving clause preserved eviction proceedings under the 1965 Act where the new Act contained corresponding provisions that were analogous, not identical, so the eviction action remained maintainable. The revisional jurisdiction under the 1965 Act was wider than section 115 CPC and allowed scrutiny of the legality, regularity and propriety of the subletting finding, so the District Court could reappraise that issue. On the evidence, exclusive occupation by a third party, a name board, daily rent payment and a telephone installation supported an inference of parting with possession, so subletting was proved and the eviction order was sustained. en-us Mon, 21 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Oct 2018 11:18:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275529 A repealed rent-control law's saving clause preserved eviction proceedings under the 1965 Act where the new Act contained corresponding provisions that were analogous, not identical, so the eviction action remained maintainable. The revisional jurisdiction under the 1965 Act was wider than section 115 CPC and allowed scrutiny of the legality, regularity and propriety of the subletting finding, so the District Court could reappraise that issue. On the evidence, exclusive occupation by a third party, a name board, daily rent payment and a telephone installation supported an inference of parting with possession, so subletting was proved and the eviction order was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275529