https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275526 The Writ Appeal challenging the selection of respondents for Manager posts was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The appellant contested the appointments of respondents 4 and 5, arguing that the law had been overruled in a review judgment. However, the Court held that the 4th respondent was qualified by the examination dates and obtained higher marks, following the law applicable at the time of appointment. The Court emphasized that candidates must be fully qualified on the application date. As no other valid points were raised, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the appointments. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Oct 2018 09:59:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275526 The Writ Appeal challenging the selection of respondents for Manager posts was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The appellant contested the appointments of respondents 4 and 5, arguing that the law had been overruled in a review judgment. However, the Court held that the 4th respondent was qualified by the examination dates and obtained higher marks, following the law applicable at the time of appointment. The Court emphasized that candidates must be fully qualified on the application date. As no other valid points were raised, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the appointments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275526