<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1164 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275519</link>
    <description>Section 91 CrPC permits summons for material that is necessary or desirable for a fair trial and effective defence, including third-party call detail records where they are relevant to cross-examination and the defence case. The request cannot be rejected mechanically merely because related records of another witness are already on record or because of an inconsistent approach in similar applications. The court emphasised that relevance to the real controversy and the need for effective testing of witness evidence must be examined before refusal. The rejection order was set aside, and the records were directed to be preserved and produced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 09:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1164 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275519</link>
      <description>Section 91 CrPC permits summons for material that is necessary or desirable for a fair trial and effective defence, including third-party call detail records where they are relevant to cross-examination and the defence case. The request cannot be rejected mechanically merely because related records of another witness are already on record or because of an inconsistent approach in similar applications. The court emphasised that relevance to the real controversy and the need for effective testing of witness evidence must be examined before refusal. The rejection order was set aside, and the records were directed to be preserved and produced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>