<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 279 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1 crore made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as no incriminating material was found during the search, and the assessment for the relevant year had not abated. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the additions were not justified without incriminating material and when assessments were not abated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 07:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 279 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1 crore made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as no incriminating material was found during the search, and the assessment for the relevant year had not abated. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the additions were not justified without incriminating material and when assessments were not abated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>