<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14719</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act was invalid as the reasons provided were not substantial and were based on the opinion of the internal audit party, which is not considered valid information for initiating reassessment proceedings. The court quashed the reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner and confirming the interim order without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14719</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act was invalid as the reasons provided were not substantial and were based on the opinion of the internal audit party, which is not considered valid information for initiating reassessment proceedings. The court quashed the reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner and confirming the interim order without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>