https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368297 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the limitation ground. The decision was made solely on the time bar issue, without delving into the merit of the case. The appellant's proactive disclosure of information and the debatable legal nature of the issue were crucial factors in determining the demand's limitation. The judgment emphasized that no malafide intent could be attributed to the appellant given the legal uncertainties surrounding the matter. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Oct 2018 07:05:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368297 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the limitation ground. The decision was made solely on the time bar issue, without delving into the merit of the case. The appellant's proactive disclosure of information and the debatable legal nature of the issue were crucial factors in determining the demand's limitation. The judgment emphasized that no malafide intent could be attributed to the appellant given the legal uncertainties surrounding the matter. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368297