<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1242 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275512</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case involving M/s. Special Prints Ltd. and M/s. Garden Silk Mills Ltd. to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication due to their related person relationship. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was deemed inadequate as it did not thoroughly address certain issues raised by SPL, such as the valuation of goods sold to a related person and the issue of limitation. The Tribunal ordered all appeals to be reconsidered by the Commissioner to ensure a comprehensive examination of the matter, allowing the appellants to present their case anew without expressing any opinion on the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 17:22:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1242 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275512</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case involving M/s. Special Prints Ltd. and M/s. Garden Silk Mills Ltd. to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication due to their related person relationship. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was deemed inadequate as it did not thoroughly address certain issues raised by SPL, such as the valuation of goods sold to a related person and the issue of limitation. The Tribunal ordered all appeals to be reconsidered by the Commissioner to ensure a comprehensive examination of the matter, allowing the appellants to present their case anew without expressing any opinion on the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>