<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 226 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368260</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging the prohibition order passed without notice under Regulation 23 of Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2013. The Court held that the order violated principles of natural justice, emphasizing the need for an opportunity of hearing before imposing such restrictions. Relying on a previous Division Bench decision, the Court set aside the prohibition order, directing the Commissioner of Customs to provide a fresh decision with a hearing opportunity for the petitioner within four weeks. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, based on the importance of natural justice and adherence to legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 07:38:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 226 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368260</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging the prohibition order passed without notice under Regulation 23 of Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2013. The Court held that the order violated principles of natural justice, emphasizing the need for an opportunity of hearing before imposing such restrictions. Relying on a previous Division Bench decision, the Court set aside the prohibition order, directing the Commissioner of Customs to provide a fresh decision with a hearing opportunity for the petitioner within four weeks. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, based on the importance of natural justice and adherence to legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>