<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 221 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368255</link>
    <description>The court declined to interfere in a challenge to a show cause notice under FEMA, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating actual prejudice from procedural shortcomings. The petitioner alleged a violation of natural justice due to non-furnishing of all relied-upon documents, impacting their defense. The court held that unless there is a jurisdictional issue, violation of natural justice, or challenge to statute validity, interference in statutory authorities&#039; proceedings is not warranted. The petition was rejected, but the petitioner was granted the opportunity to respond to the notice, with no express opinion on the case&#039;s merits to maintain fairness for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 09:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 221 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368255</link>
      <description>The court declined to interfere in a challenge to a show cause notice under FEMA, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating actual prejudice from procedural shortcomings. The petitioner alleged a violation of natural justice due to non-furnishing of all relied-upon documents, impacting their defense. The court held that unless there is a jurisdictional issue, violation of natural justice, or challenge to statute validity, interference in statutory authorities&#039; proceedings is not warranted. The petition was rejected, but the petitioner was granted the opportunity to respond to the notice, with no express opinion on the case&#039;s merits to maintain fairness for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>