https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368254 The Court, following precedent in Suresh Kumar Bansal, found the petitioners entitled to relief in challenging service tax collection for residential flat construction under Section 65(105)(zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's claim, including verifying documents and issuing a refund order within four months. The Commissioner of Service Tax/GST (East Zone) was tasked with facilitating the refund process by issuing notices and eliciting the builder's statement. The writ petition was allowed, granting relief to the petitioners as per the Court's directions. en-us Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368254 The Court, following precedent in Suresh Kumar Bansal, found the petitioners entitled to relief in challenging service tax collection for residential flat construction under Section 65(105)(zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's claim, including verifying documents and issuing a refund order within four months. The Commissioner of Service Tax/GST (East Zone) was tasked with facilitating the refund process by issuing notices and eliciting the builder's statement. The writ petition was allowed, granting relief to the petitioners as per the Court's directions. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368254