<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368245</link>
    <description>A 23-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned on condition that costs be paid by the stipulated date. The tribunal treated compliance with the cost direction as a prerequisite for maintaining the appeal and directed that the matter be listed with the connected appeals. The operative effect was to allow the delayed appeal to proceed, subject to timely payment of costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 07:37:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368245</link>
      <description>A 23-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned on condition that costs be paid by the stipulated date. The tribunal treated compliance with the cost direction as a prerequisite for maintaining the appeal and directed that the matter be listed with the connected appeals. The operative effect was to allow the delayed appeal to proceed, subject to timely payment of costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>