https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275489 Where a statutory appeal under Section 46(5) was already pending against recovery orders for value added tax and entry tax, the writ court declined to entertain the petition on merits and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The court considered it inappropriate to interfere at that stage, but protected the petitioner by requiring expeditious disposal of the stay and waiver-of-predeposit applications and by restraining coercive recovery until those applications were decided, subject to compliance with the directed deposit and appearance before the appellate authority. en-us Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Oct 2018 07:33:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275489 Where a statutory appeal under Section 46(5) was already pending against recovery orders for value added tax and entry tax, the writ court declined to entertain the petition on merits and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The court considered it inappropriate to interfere at that stage, but protected the petitioner by requiring expeditious disposal of the stay and waiver-of-predeposit applications and by restraining coercive recovery until those applications were decided, subject to compliance with the directed deposit and appearance before the appellate authority. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275489