<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1324 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275490</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation challenging the cancellation of their registration under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The court ordered that if the cancellation order was not served to the petitioner, they should receive an authenticated copy. The respondent was instructed to make a decision based on merit and within three weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 07:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1324 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275490</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation challenging the cancellation of their registration under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The court ordered that if the cancellation order was not served to the petitioner, they should receive an authenticated copy. The respondent was instructed to make a decision based on merit and within three weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>