https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275491 The High Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a coaching institute, in a tax dispute. The court found that the appellant's self-disclosed undisclosed income of Rs. 34,00,000 was sufficient, rejecting the Revenue's appeal seeking to include additional undisclosed income of Rs. 80.00 lacs. The court emphasized the appellant's right to explain statements made during the search and seizure operation, ultimately dismissing the Revenue's appeal for lack of merit. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Oct 2018 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275491 The High Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a coaching institute, in a tax dispute. The court found that the appellant's self-disclosed undisclosed income of Rs. 34,00,000 was sufficient, rejecting the Revenue's appeal seeking to include additional undisclosed income of Rs. 80.00 lacs. The court emphasized the appellant's right to explain statements made during the search and seizure operation, ultimately dismissing the Revenue's appeal for lack of merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275491