https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275496 Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was upheld as a valid safeguard because prior sanction for prosecuting public servants protects against frivolous, vexatious, or mala fide proceedings. The Court held that the mere possibility of misuse does not render the sanction requirement unconstitutional, and its operation must remain consistent with rule of law and probity in public life. On the request for further regulatory directions, the Court found the existing law already covered the field and declined to issue additional mandatory guidelines, leaving no new directions on sanction procedure. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Oct 2018 07:33:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275496 Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was upheld as a valid safeguard because prior sanction for prosecuting public servants protects against frivolous, vexatious, or mala fide proceedings. The Court held that the mere possibility of misuse does not render the sanction requirement unconstitutional, and its operation must remain consistent with rule of law and probity in public life. On the request for further regulatory directions, the Court found the existing law already covered the field and declined to issue additional mandatory guidelines, leaving no new directions on sanction procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275496