<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1374 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275498</link>
    <description>Liquidation under the insolvency framework is a last resort and cannot be pursued without first inviting expressions of interest and resolution plans. The resolution professional must facilitate a proper resolution process by calling for prospective applicants before any recommendation for liquidation is made; where that step is omitted, the liquidation recommendation is not accepted. The failure to invite resolution plans also shows non-compliance with the resolution professional&#039;s duties, making continuation of the existing resolution professional inappropriate. In that situation, the process may be continued under a substituted resolution professional, with time extended for further insolvency steps and valuation reconsidered if necessary; the final status report of the earlier professional was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 07:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1374 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275498</link>
      <description>Liquidation under the insolvency framework is a last resort and cannot be pursued without first inviting expressions of interest and resolution plans. The resolution professional must facilitate a proper resolution process by calling for prospective applicants before any recommendation for liquidation is made; where that step is omitted, the liquidation recommendation is not accepted. The failure to invite resolution plans also shows non-compliance with the resolution professional&#039;s duties, making continuation of the existing resolution professional inappropriate. In that situation, the process may be continued under a substituted resolution professional, with time extended for further insolvency steps and valuation reconsidered if necessary; the final status report of the earlier professional was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>