<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1749 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275443</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed regarding the disallowance under section 14A, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to Rs. 50,000. The appeal filed by the Revenue concerning the rate of depreciation on moulds was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation at 30%. The Tribunal maintained these decisions on both issues in its order pronounced on 5.12.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 10:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1749 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275443</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed regarding the disallowance under section 14A, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to Rs. 50,000. The appeal filed by the Revenue concerning the rate of depreciation on moulds was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation at 30%. The Tribunal maintained these decisions on both issues in its order pronounced on 5.12.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>