<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1613 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the distinction between bogus liabilities and ceased trading liabilities under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer based on subsequent payments through banking channels, indicating the existence of the liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 10:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1613 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the distinction between bogus liabilities and ceased trading liabilities under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer based on subsequent payments through banking channels, indicating the existence of the liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>