<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14696</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for reconsideration. The Department was allowed to rectify their appeal and provide further evidence. The Tribunal was instructed to review the case within four months, taking into account the issues raised and the impact of the assessment orders on the individual sellers. No costs were awarded in the disposition of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:11:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14696</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for reconsideration. The Department was allowed to rectify their appeal and provide further evidence. The Tribunal was instructed to review the case within four months, taking into account the issues raised and the impact of the assessment orders on the individual sellers. No costs were awarded in the disposition of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>