<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1388 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275453</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC approved the Second Motion Petition concerning a scheme of arrangement and de-merger under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant Registrar of Companies, accepted notice for the Regional Director. The petition required service at the Regional Director&#039;s office, with an eight-week deadline for response and publication in &#039;Business Standard&#039; newspapers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1388 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275453</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC approved the Second Motion Petition concerning a scheme of arrangement and de-merger under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant Registrar of Companies, accepted notice for the Regional Director. The petition required service at the Regional Director&#039;s office, with an eight-week deadline for response and publication in &#039;Business Standard&#039; newspapers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>