<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368233</link>
    <description>HC allowed correction of a typographical error in Form TRAN-1 for Cenvat credit. The court recognized the potential for human error and suggested the Central Government could issue an order under Section 172 to address such administrative challenges. Case was adjourned for further deliberation, with potential implications for tax credit reconciliation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368233</link>
      <description>HC allowed correction of a typographical error in Form TRAN-1 for Cenvat credit. The court recognized the potential for human error and suggested the Central Government could issue an order under Section 172 to address such administrative challenges. Case was adjourned for further deliberation, with potential implications for tax credit reconciliation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>