<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 172 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368206</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, prematurity, and advised the petitioner to challenge any adverse orders in the appropriate court. The Court refrained from assessing the merits of the case, highlighting the necessity for a thorough review of the petitioner&#039;s response to the show cause notice before making a determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 172 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368206</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, prematurity, and advised the petitioner to challenge any adverse orders in the appropriate court. The Court refrained from assessing the merits of the case, highlighting the necessity for a thorough review of the petitioner&#039;s response to the show cause notice before making a determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>