<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 163 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368197</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of CENVAT Credit on Service Tax paid for renting immovable property. The issue stemmed from the Revenue rejecting the refund claim due to two invoices being raised in the same month for rent paid to two co-owners. However, it was established that the invoices were issued separately by each co-owner, justifying the Service Tax payment. As a result, the rejection of the refund claim was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed with appropriate relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:29:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 163 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368197</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of CENVAT Credit on Service Tax paid for renting immovable property. The issue stemmed from the Revenue rejecting the refund claim due to two invoices being raised in the same month for rent paid to two co-owners. However, it was established that the invoices were issued separately by each co-owner, justifying the Service Tax payment. As a result, the rejection of the refund claim was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed with appropriate relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>