<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 160 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368194</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for clearances without proper invoices but allowed the disputed CENVAT Credit based on allegedly ineligible documents. Penalties imposed were set aside as the appellants had sufficient credit to discharge the duty liability, indicating no intention to evade payment. The appeal was partly allowed, with the duty demand upheld, the CENVAT Credit allowed, and penalties extinguished.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 160 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368194</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for clearances without proper invoices but allowed the disputed CENVAT Credit based on allegedly ineligible documents. Penalties imposed were set aside as the appellants had sufficient credit to discharge the duty liability, indicating no intention to evade payment. The appeal was partly allowed, with the duty demand upheld, the CENVAT Credit allowed, and penalties extinguished.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>