https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368186 The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand, citing duplication of duty payment, and remanded the matter for verification and appropriate order on the remaining demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the lack of reference to the duty amount in the appellant's pre-deposit details before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court directed deposits to stay recovery, recognizing the appellant's compliance with court orders. The case involved recovery of an erroneously granted refund, interpretation of exemption notification, provisional assessment, finalization of assessment, and appeal process, ultimately resulting in the Tribunal's decision. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:29:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368186 The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand, citing duplication of duty payment, and remanded the matter for verification and appropriate order on the remaining demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the lack of reference to the duty amount in the appellant's pre-deposit details before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court directed deposits to stay recovery, recognizing the appellant's compliance with court orders. The case involved recovery of an erroneously granted refund, interpretation of exemption notification, provisional assessment, finalization of assessment, and appeal process, ultimately resulting in the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368186