https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275434 An order refusing leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 378 CrPC must disclose reasons and reflect application of mind to the material before the High Court. A non-speaking refusal prevents meaningful appellate scrutiny and fails to satisfy the judicial duty to give reasons. The Supreme Court held that an unreasoned refusal of leave was unsustainable, set it aside, and remitted the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Dec 2023 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275434 An order refusing leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 378 CrPC must disclose reasons and reflect application of mind to the material before the High Court. A non-speaking refusal prevents meaningful appellate scrutiny and fails to satisfy the judicial duty to give reasons. The Supreme Court held that an unreasoned refusal of leave was unsustainable, set it aside, and remitted the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275434