<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Goods Classification Dispute: Revenue Fails to Reclassify Chewing Tobacco as Jarda Scented Tobacco Without Evidence or Expert Testimony.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41786</link>
    <description>Classification of goods - in the absence of test reports or expert’s opinion, the Revenue’s endeavour to hold that the goods being manufactured by the appellant are not chewing tobacco, but Jarda scented tobacco cannot be appreciated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:42:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Goods Classification Dispute: Revenue Fails to Reclassify Chewing Tobacco as Jarda Scented Tobacco Without Evidence or Expert Testimony.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41786</link>
      <description>Classification of goods - in the absence of test reports or expert’s opinion, the Revenue’s endeavour to hold that the goods being manufactured by the appellant are not chewing tobacco, but Jarda scented tobacco cannot be appreciated.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:42:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>