https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14681 Coastal regulation and development control objections were rejected because the plot was not shown to fall within the prohibited zone and hotel construction was treated as permissible in the relevant CRZ categories. Alleged breaches of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, development permission, and the sanctioned development plan were also rejected, with the court finding the permissions and revisions to be within the upheld planning framework. The amalgamation order could not be collaterally impeached in writ proceedings as fraudulent or illegal, since the sanctioned scheme was final and binding and no fraud on the company court was established. Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act was held inapplicable to a court-sanctioned amalgamation, which operates by force of law rather than as an ordinary transfer agreement. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14681 Coastal regulation and development control objections were rejected because the plot was not shown to fall within the prohibited zone and hotel construction was treated as permissible in the relevant CRZ categories. Alleged breaches of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, development permission, and the sanctioned development plan were also rejected, with the court finding the permissions and revisions to be within the upheld planning framework. The amalgamation order could not be collaterally impeached in writ proceedings as fraudulent or illegal, since the sanctioned scheme was final and binding and no fraud on the company court was established. Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act was held inapplicable to a court-sanctioned amalgamation, which operates by force of law rather than as an ordinary transfer agreement. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14681