<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14680</link>
    <description>Depreciation was held allowable on assets transferred by the Government even though no registered deed of conveyance existed, following the Court&#039;s earlier ruling on the same issue. The contribution to the insurance fund, including the initial contribution, was not treated as deductible and was not accepted as a contingent liability, in line with the earlier decision involving the same assessee. The claim for deduction of interest on a loan taken from the State Government was not confined to section 36(1) and had to be examined under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:36:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14680</link>
      <description>Depreciation was held allowable on assets transferred by the Government even though no registered deed of conveyance existed, following the Court&#039;s earlier ruling on the same issue. The contribution to the insurance fund, including the initial contribution, was not treated as deductible and was not accepted as a contingent liability, in line with the earlier decision involving the same assessee. The claim for deduction of interest on a loan taken from the State Government was not confined to section 36(1) and had to be examined under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>